Source: ProProfs |
On Monday, students at Aleppo
University were going through the
same turmoil students all around the world are all too familiar with. They’d
done the nights at the books, the highlighting, the frantic messages to friends
to get an explanation on some concept or other they didn’t understand (that
would definitely be on the exam because that’s just the joy of exams, isn’t
it?)... They’d done it and they were ready to get their first exam over and
done with. They said goodbye to their families and left for university. The
anxious wait outside the exam hall, the preparation of stationery, the seating
in a room of nervous whispers, and then the exam began. Two explosions hit the
campus. At least 83 people killed and 150 critically injured. How many students
put in all that work, never to see the outcome?
What’s sad is, we can’t understand it. We want to, we think
we do, but we don’t. To us, 83 and 150 are numbers. Building a picture of 83 or
150 people in our heads is actually too difficult to do. We know it’s
tragic, we know it’s inhumane, we know it’s wrong... but we find it difficult
to feel all those things until something else happens first. We need to empathise.
A psychological study gave participants some money and then
gave them the opportunity to donate it to help children suffering from famine
in Malawi . In
one condition, they were told that food shortages were affecting over three
million children. In another condition they were shown a picture of a girl
called Rokia and told that her life would be changed for the better with their
donation. Despite the fact that those in the first condition knew about the
huge extent of the famine, those who were introduced to Rokia donated
significantly more. You might be thinking it was solely the effect of the
picture. Cleverly, the psychologists added a third condition. In this they
showed Rokia, told them how their donation would help her but also gave the
statistic that over three million children were affected too. Did these people
donate more? No, they actually donated less. To make things even more baffling,
telling participants about another child, as well as Rokia, who was also
suffering, still yielded less donations that introducing Rokia alone. These
results show that we find it difficult to emotionally connect and empathise if
we’re presented with more than one person suffering. If we’re told three
million people need help, logically this means your donation is more important,
but we find it difficult to process that emotionally. Anything over one person
and we lose our ability to connect.
Why do you think the NSPCC shows just one little toddler
with a tear running down his face? Or why a charity’s income generation project
highlights one mother’s quest to look after her whole family by selling scraps
she’s found on the street? They know they need to appeal to our emotions, and
to emotionally connect, we need a person, one person. What’s a little awful is, telling
people about this effect actually makes them more resistant to it when the
technique is used. That is the exact opposite of my intention. Think of it this
way, when a charity uses the single identifiable victim, they’re not
manipulating you, they’re helping you see things for what they really are.
They’re helping you understand emotionally what situation people are living in
and that it’s affecting human beings and not just statistical entities.
Be grateful, and what I’m proposing is, with this knowledge, use the same
technique on yourself. You don’t always have a charity showing you a
heartbreaking video of every single massacre, natural disaster or other
catastrophic event, so make one up for yourself.
The next time you hear of an earthquake, an epidemic, a
school shooting, a tsunami, a famine, an increase of homelessness, a university
being bombed... humanise it. Don’t get overwhelmed by the numbers but break it
down to just one individual who was affected. It may be a young girl who lost
her home in a natural disaster and can’t wear her favourite pink dress anymore, so
she keeps crying about it to her mother days later. It may be a father who was
made disabled by an air raid and so can no longer provide for his family or do
things he used to love, like playing football on the street with his friends. Go
back to the person you know who’s going through exam period right now. Imagine
them not coming home from their next exam. If it’s you suffering through those
dreaded tests, imagine yourself sitting in your exam and then hearing
explosions and finding out one of your classmates had died. Make it real,
because it is real.
"If I look at the mass I will never act. If I look at the one, I will." - Mother Teresa
Connecting to the victims means we’re more likely to help,
and there can only be good in that. As we saw in the previous study, it means
we’re more likely to give charity. That can go towards easing someone’s
situation which will, in turn mean Allāh will help ease yours in the next. The
charity will actually increase your wealth and reward and purify you of sins.
The little extra effort and imagination you might have to put in to motivate
yourself with be worth every second. Even if you don’t have a single penny to
your name, you have the believer’s invisible weapon, du’ā’. If you encourage
yourself to empathise with those suffering in your area or outside of it, your
prayers to Allāh for them will be filled with so much more urgency, sincerity
and passion. You won’t just have a weapon, you’ll have a powerful one.
Remember, the students at Aleppo
University aren’t the only ones
sitting an exam; we’re living one every single day of our lives. And on Results
Day, our exam paper will be assessed. We got the stats, we can’t claim we
didn’t know about the three million children in Malawi
who were starving to death or the 150 people injured on the Aleppo
University campus. We knew, but did
we bother to feel it? We can look at it all like a numbers game, but that isn’t
going to get us the results we’re hoping for.
Recommended Reading
AlJazeera English - Dozens Killed in Aleppo University Blasts
Peter Hurford - Why Don't People Help Others More?
Source: Think Theology |
Recommended Reading
AlJazeera English - Dozens Killed in Aleppo University Blasts
Peter Hurford - Why Don't People Help Others More?
Love it, mashaa Allah. It puts everything into context.
ReplyDeleteAlhamdulillah. Jazakillahu khairan for your comment, Warda!
DeleteSubhanAllah I was just reading this and relating to Ramadan and how useless and overwhelmed I was feeling in terms of giving charity to the many organisations campaigning in this blessed month. I care about so many projects locally based but also the heart wrenching suffering of our brothers and sisters all over the world. I had a bit of a shameful hulk moment and decided I wasn't going to donate the few pounds in my account to anyone, because there are too many worthy people and only a meagre amount. Then I read this and was reminded of my greatest weapon....DUA! I need to remember the PERFECTION of the One I'm asking from not what I'm asking for! Jazakillahu khayran and Ramadan Mubarak:)
ReplyDeleteAlhamdulillah, I'm so happy to hear my writing will lead to some good deeds! Jazakillahu khairan for sharing Hajara. May Allah bless your Ramadan and bless your wealth so you're able to give to every organisation that asks you for it.
Delete